This research is designed to address the following questions:
-
How do key stakeholder groups assess tradeoffs associated with alternate approaches to restoration? [more...]
-
How do citizens generally judge acceptability of alternate approaches to restoration? [more...]
-
What institutional factors (laws, regulations, policy statements, etc.) are likely to influence managers’ decisions whether to propose alternate treatments?
-
How do grazing permittees assess tradeoffs associated with alternate approaches to restoration on public lands?
-
What differences exist in the understandability, credibility, and helpfulness of various methods for communicating about alternate approaches to restoration?
-
How do citizens judge the acceptability of alternate approaches to restoration after having observed the progress of those approaches?


